КРИТЕРІЇ МЕДІАБЕЛЬНОСТІ В КОНТЕКСТІ СИСТЕМИ ВИРІШЕННЯ СПОРІВ
Abstract
Romanadze L. D. Criteria of mediability in the context of the dispute resolution system. - Article.
In recent years, alternative methods of dispute resolution are gradually gaining popularity in Ukraine, in particular, mediation and bill work on the institutionalization of mediation, which, among other things, is to determine the scope of mediation. However, the scope of mediation cannot be comprehensive given the nature of the dispute, the presence or absence of third party interests, the capacity of the parties to the dispute and their subjective attitude to resolving the dispute in a certain way and other factors. The choice of the parties to the dispute should be ensured not only institutionally, but also should be provided with accessible and reasonable information on the criteria for selecting certain dispute resolution procedures.
The development of clear and sound criteria for the mediability of the dispute is the key to the effective devel
opment of mediation as an alternative method of dispute resolution, the formation of public confidence in mediation through an understanding of its essence and nature. The mediability of the dispute should be understood as a set of features of a particular dispute, capacity and subjective attitude of the parties to the dispute, the possibility of compliance with the principles of mediation in a particular mediation procedure, which together determine the objective and subjective possibility of mediation.
On the basis of the conducted analysis the criteria of mediability of disputes are formulated: constant criteria, the influence of which excludes the possibility of mediation; variable criteria, the limits of which on the mediabil- ity of the dispute may vary as a result of the work of the mediator, representatives of the parties to the dispute and the adjustment of external circumstances, etc. In turn, to better understand the essence of both the mediation procedure and the category of mediability of the dispute, it is proposed to identify: variable criteria that increase the probability of the beginning of the mediation procedure and its effective completion; variable criteria that reduce the probability of initiating a mediation procedure and its successful completion variable criteria related to the subjective attitude of a particular mediator to the assessment of the mediability of a particular dispute.
References
2. Головатий В., Горова А., Коваль Р., Синюшко М., Семчишин О., Шидловська Л. Стратегії забезпечення
життєздатності відновних практик: механізм співпра¬ці правової системи та громади заради суспільної без-пеки : посібник. Київ, 2009. 224 с.
3. Бортнікова А. Критерії медіабельності публічно- правового спору. Visegrad journal on human rights. 20l7. № 6. URL: http://vjhr.sk/ archive/2017_6/5.pdf (дата звернення: 30.01.2021).
4. Мазаракі Н. Щодо поняття медіабельності спору. Підприємництво, господарство і право. 2018. № 12. С. 258-262.
5. Halsey v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust [2004] EWCA Civ 576. URL: http://www.bailii.org/ ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2004/576.html (дата звернення:
30.01.2021) .
6. Медиация : учебник / Под ред. А. Карпенко, А. Осиновского. Москва, 2016. 470 с.
7. Бесемер Х. Медиация. Посредничество в кон¬фликтах. Калуга, 2005. 176 с.
8. Carducci G. The importance of legal context and other considerations in assessing the suitability of nego-tiation, mediation, arbitration and litigation in resolving effectively domestic and international disputes (employ-ment disputes and beyond). St. John’s Law Review. 2012. № 86(2). С. 511-541.
9. Державний стандарт соціальної послуги посеред¬ництва (медіації) : наказ Міністерства соціальної полі¬тики від 17.08.2016 № 892. URL: https://zakon.rada. gov.ua/laws/show/z1243-16#Text (дата звернення:
30.01.2021) .